S ono many, many, perhaps infinite, contingencies and procedures that serve to express (and who express) a work of architecture. There is no single project can be cloned an infinite number of times: that is "way".
There are, however, many projects and each one different from the other values, texture and definition.
The multiplicity of the project stems from the heterogeneity of the world, but is mainly influenced by his being placed in a precise moment in cultural history.
The glossy impulsivity and hysterical of genius is the only chance we have to read and understand a context, it will be useful also to write a draft, and this will necessarily be writing poetry, that is dictated, by the poetry of the heart.
The architects have unfortunately fallen asleep on the reasoning of the story.
Art has always moved between two poles: one represented in mythology, Apollo (abstract and brain), on the one hand, and Dionisio (expressionism and heart), on the other. Unfortunately, the constructive art of our time seems more attracted to the first pole, with the result of creating an intellectual who makes arid, dry, but above all, anachronistic.
